My random thoughts...
Saturday, 08 December 2007
-

Currently Watching
24 - Season Three
By Kiefer Sutherland, Carlos Bernard, Reiko Aylesworth, Dennis Haysbert
see relatedIt's finally TODAY!
I have finally read all the papers that stacked up while we were on vacation. In honor of this notable accomplishment, here are some noteworthy comic strips from the past couple weeks ...





Thursday, 15 November 2007
-

Currently Watching
NCIS Naval Criminal Investigative Service - The Complete Third Season
By Ncis
see relatedSo Derek said I'd been a slacker...
...about posting, so here goes!
eh, nevermind, don't feel like posting after all. sorry, derek!
Friday, 10 August 2007
-

Currently Watching
NCIS Naval Criminal Investigative Service - The Complete First Season
By Ncis
see relatedInteresting quotes from my husband this evening...
"How can I be 'the honorable'?" after Secretary of Education Margaret Spelling was introduced as "The Honorable Margaret Spelling" on Celebrity Jeopardy. (Amusingly enough, our Secretary of Education couldn't beat out a couple of actors. Sad, huh? Not that this was a surprise, though, since this was a re-run that I watched the first time around...)
"Don't we need cookie mix?" in response to my suggestion that we use the caramel-chocolate chips for cookies later instead of adding them to the cake batter tonight. I showed him the back of the bag of chips, where the recipe can always be found, so he could see the exact ingredients required to make cookies. A few moments later came the next quote...
"So you mean this is just flour and sugar and some other stuff?" he asked while holding the bag of cake mix.
"You're right. This bag has a recipe too!" as he held up another bag of chocolate chips.
"So who reads your Xanga?" he asked after I told him I was beginning this post. He was okay with it once I explain it's only Jenelle and sometimes Derek.
Friday, 08 June 2007
-
One more news tidbit for you: http://www.boundlessline.org/2007/06/encouraging_emb.html (I'm not going to try to be eloquent. Instead, I'll leave it up to Boundless. Here's a hint, though: promising new stem cell research developments that don't involve using cells from babies who have been killed.)
-
I enjoy this tidbit from the last debate of Republican candidates for the '08 presidential election ... when Giuliani steps up to the mike to answer a question about his stance on abortion (FYI: he's pro-abortion ... yes, I chose not to use "pro-choice" since nowadays the media use "anti-abortion" to describe those who are "pro-life"), lightning struck! See it and his reponse on YouTube - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ibqwKb4cCsg.
My enjoyment ends at the lightning strike, though. His statements are astounding! It baffles me that his religion is just something that he "consults" rather than something that affects his decisions. I can almost understand being pro-abortion if you believe that abortion is right and that a baby in the womb is not actually a life. I can't even begin to understand being pro-life personally and pro-abortion politically. If it comes down to Rudy or one of the Democratic candidates, I might have to abstain (for more reasons that merely his stance on abortion, but that's a biggie), which is a huge statement for me since I detest the idea of not voting.
Friday, 25 May 2007
-

Currently Watching
Gilmore Girls - The Complete Fifth Season
By Gilmore Girls
see relatedI was a Communication Studies major at UNC-CH (translation: got to take lots of fun classes that had little to no real-world application ... ahh, I miss academia!), and I was at one time planning to go into audiology or speech pathology. (That means I did take some useful science classes and I can tell you random facts about your hearing and speech!) That ceased to be my life plan a few years back. Nonetheless, I have held onto all of my old notes, notecards, textbooks, and graduate school catalogs, moving them from UNC to my first house in Texas to my second house in Texas to our home here in North Carolina. It turns out that this is quite fortuitous for one of my old Refinery girls, Emily,. who just finished her freshman year at UNC-CH. She is majoring in Linguistics and taking all the speech and hearing classes that I took. Today we're meeting up for lunch at NCSU (she's taking a class there this summer), and I'm passing off this welath of material from my days in those courses. And I'm, pondering these questions: Why do I feel sad giving this stuff away if I'm never going to use it anyway? Why is only a part of me joyful that I can help Emily? Why am I sentimental about my anatomy textbooks?
Wednesday, 09 May 2007
-
I've been fired up about this for a while, so please allow me to pull out my soapbox. And, be assured, if I rant too much, you will find a fun tidbit at the end to amuse you without making you think too hard!
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommended at the end of last year that all pregnant women should have a nuchal translucency test to determine the odds of carrying a baby with Down syndrome. I'll avoid too much mental mumbo-jumbo here since you can Google it yourself, but this test can be done between week 11 and 13 of pregnancy and uses an ultrasound to check for fluid in the back of the baby's (yes, I said "baby" not "fetus") neck since that can be an indicator of abnormalities. The test results are something like, "Your baby has 1 in 250 chance of having an abnormality." If that risk is higher than the average risk for a woman at your age having a baby with a disorder, then your baby is considered to be at high risk. Of babies with Down syndrome or another abnormality, it will correctly identify the baby as being at risk about 80% of the time. Of babies with no abnormality, it will incorrectly identify the baby as being at risk roughly 5% of the time. Prior to this new recommendation, the test was only advised for women over the age of 35 since the incidence of having a baby with a genetic disorder increases with age. Now it is recommended for every pregnant woman. Check out more at Babycenter or the Raleigh News & Observer.
At my first visit for my pregnancy with Jocelyn, I was given a plethora of information about different tests that could be done for various issues or abnormalities. This despite the fact that as a then-23-year-old healthy Caucasian woman (some disorders are linked to minority ethnicities and the health or age of the mother) the odds of a positive from any of those tests was nil. I was advised that insurance would not likely cover any of them because of that, but I was given the information in case we wanted to have the tests done anyway on our dime. Because we didn't want to spare the extra expense and because we would rather not know about any disorder prior to the birth of our children, I initially ignored the pamphlets. Later, out of curiosity and a bit of boredom, I dug them out and researched the tests. I was floored! The rates of false positives for many of the tests were astronomical, and none of the tests could definitively say, "Your child will have _______" but rather just implied a greater risk. That's scary, especially considering that a study conducted by Psychology and Genetics Research Group at Kings College in London found that 92% of women who were given a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome aborted their babies. The other four disorders studied had lower abortion rates, but the lowest (for Klinefelter syndrome) was still 58%.
My friend Amanda is currently pregnant, and she was going to have some of the tests done. She's a little older than me, so she might be at a higher risk, but she's still in her 20s. She is an intelligent woman, and she felt like she was supposed to do them. When she talked to me about our choice not to, she was relieved and cancelled them. However, I am concerned that many women, like Amanda, receive the message from their doctors that they need to have these tests done. Then some doctors encourage abortion as an option if the tests show that the baby MIGHT have a problem. (By the way, I do realize that some people would like to know about the risks for abnormalities in advance so they aren't caught off guard on their baby's birth day, and I'm cool with that. But it should be your choice to have the tests rather than being portrayed as something that any wise mother would have done.)
Let me interject an "attagirl" for my mom here. Back in 1981 when she became pregnant with me, she was 37. That's not uncommon now, but then it was. She was told that I would most likely have all sorts of problems and advised that terminating the pregnancy was an option she should consider. She did have some tests done, which were more rudimentary than the ones available today, and those tests still indicated that there was a high risk of my having some sort of disorder. Mom made the right choice. And, while no one who knows me would call me "normal," I did not have any abnormalities.
With a positive result from the nuchal translucency test, women can choose to undergo further, more invasive testing to determine with more accuracy the chance that their child will have a disorder. While more invasive testing gives few false positives, the risk is still there. Additionally, many of those tests, such as amniocentesis, carry with them a small risk of miscarriage, so they can put your baby at greater risk. The Associated Press article in the Raleigh News & Observer stated, "A woman determined to be high risk then still has time for an invasive test to tell for sure." Still has time for what? Oh, yes, she still has time to kill her unborn child. Lovely. (I almost wrote a letter to the editor about that, but I was preoccupied with swelling ankles and my inability to stand up without the aid of something to push off of. For those of you don't grasp my imagery, I was in my last month of pregnancy when this article was published.)
Now let me pull out a second soapbox. Even if these tests were perfect, which they aren't, the notion that children with abnormalities should be aborted is anathema to me. I wasn't at the Joy Prom held at Providence Baptist Church last weekend, but if I had been I would have seen a beautiful event in which more than 600 "abnormal" people enjoyed their own prom, complete with formalwear, dancing, and decorations. Perhaps some of those 600+ wonderful individuals would not have made it out of their mothers' wombs alive had these tests been available when they were in utero. I have more often seen the child-like faith lauded by Christ in Matthew 11::25, 18:3, 21:15-16, Mark 10:14, Luke 10:21, and 18:16. When we welcome those with disabilities in our lives, we are in a way responding to Christ's urging to welcome children in his name (Mark 9:37). Don't misunderstand me; I, as a former special education teacher, do realize the difficulties that come with having a child with a disability. And I am selfishly grateful that Jocelyn does not have an disabilities to our knowledge. I don't claim to understand the greatness of God and His infinite wisdom, but I do know that He operates with a purpose and He, as the Creator of all life, values life. He knit together every child in his or her mother's womb, and I don't believe His hands slipped with those "needles" and made a mistake. We may consider some "abnormal" in our worldly ways of categorizing people, but God has a purpose for "abnormal people" just as He has a purpose for you and me. And praise Him that He does!
Okay, let me store the soapboxes away until next time and give you the treat I promise ... Kool-aid pickles! While they sound kind of gross, I like Kool-aid and I like pickles, so I am tempted. Anybody with me on this one? Jenelle, you like Kool-aid ... want to try the combo?
Friday, 27 April 2007
-

Currently Watching
Gilmore Girls - The Complete Second Season
By Gilmore Girls
see relatedRandom thoughts from Shannon today
Little Jocelyn has a little cold. Her sniffles are cute and sad at the same time. It's times like this that remind me to trust Him since He is the great physician. I may be a mom, but that doesn't give me the control I wish I had, even though Erin thinks motherhood gives me superpowers. ("Shannon can fix Hannah's hair ... she's a mom!" and so on...)
So here's my beef with Gilmore Girls ... if it's such a small town, then how do they possibly have an endless supply of take-out and delivery restaurants? I lived in a small town. For the entire two years, rumors abounded that Pizza Hut was going to start delivering, but they never did and they still haven't now, another two years later. Additionally, during the first episode, when some sketchy guys are hitting on Rory and Lorelai in Luke's restaurant, Lorelai tells them that Rory is 16. Then, later that season, they celebrate Rory's 16th birthday. Sixteen again?
Jocelyn has started using her feet a whole lot. She likes to grab the toys hanging from the bar of her bouncy seat with her toes. Kicking is endless fun for her. Sometimes I find her in the crib in the morning, joyfully contented by kicking at the air. Perhaps I have a budding soccer player? Only if she has more coordination than her mother ...
At my house in Florida, we had neighbors who always left their Christmas lights up year-round. In the dorms, I had several friends who kept lights in their rooms, though they only plugged them in when the resident advisors weren't around, since they were fire hazards. at my apartment in Chapel Hill, we had neighbors who had white lights up all year. In Rio Grande City, I had several neighbors who left lights up through all the seasons, which in Texas were summer, summer, spring, and summer. So it's April, almost May, and I'm missing Christmas lights!
I'm incredibly disappointed with what I fear our options will be for the next presidential election. The guys I really like all have virtually no chance of winning the Republican nomination, given the current poll numbers, So I think I'm going to have to settle for someone who is just better than the Democratic nominee.
Wednesday, 18 April 2007
-
another joke from an old email ...
A visiting minister during the offertory prayer:
"Dear Lord," he began with arms extended and a rapturous look on his upturned face, "without you we are but dust..."
He would have continued, but at that silent, moment when he paused for a breath, one little girl (who was listening carefully for a change!) leaned over to her mother and asked quite audibly in her shrill little girl voice, "Mommy, what is butt dust?"
Monday, 16 April 2007
-

Currently Reading
Eats, Shoots & Leaves: The Zero Tolerance Approach to Punctuation
By Lynne Truss
see relatedSo I was cleaning out some old emails from my account, and I found these engineering jokes that Lee sent me when I lived in Texas. (Yes, I had some really old emails!)
By the way, you may have noticed that I'm a font junkie. I know switching fonts constantly is frowned upon by some, so if it bothers you, sorry!
Understanding Engineers - Take One
Two engineering students crossing the campus when one said, "Where did you get such a great bike?" The second engineer replied, "Well, I was walking along yesterday minding my own business when a beautiful woman rode up on this bike. She threw the bike to the ground, took off all her clothes and said, "Take what you want." The first engineer nodded approvingly, "Good choice; the clothes probably wouldn't have fit."
Understanding Engineers - Take Two
To the optimist, the glass is half full.
To the pessimist, the glass is half empty.
To the engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.
Understanding Engineers - Take Three
A pastor, a doctor and an engineer were waiting one morning for a particularly slow group of golfers. The engineer fumed, "What's with these guys? We must have been waiting for 15 minutes!" The doctor chimed in, "I don't know, but I've never seen such ineptitude!" The pastor said, "Hey, here comes the greens keeper. Let's have a word with him."
"Hi George! Say, what's with that group ahead of us? They're rather slow, aren't they?" The greens keeper replied, "Oh, yes, that's a group of blind fire-fighters. They lost their sight saving our clubhouse from a fire last year, so we always let them play for free anytime." The group was silent for a moment. The pastor said, "That's so sad. I think I will say a special prayer for them tonight." The doctor said, "Good idea. And I'm going to contact my ophthalmologist buddy and see if there's anything he can do for them." The engineer said, "Why can't these guys play at night?"
Understanding Engineers - Take Four
An engineer was crossing a road one-day when a frog called out to him and said, "If you kiss me, I'll turn into a beautiful princess." He bent over, picked up the frog and put it in his pocket. The frog spoke up again and said, "If you kiss me and turn me back into a beautiful princess, I will stay with you for one week." The engineer took the frog out of his pocket, smiled at it and returned it to the pocket. The frog then cried out, "If you kiss me and turn me back into a princess, I'll stay with you and do ANYTHING you want." Again the engineer took the frog out, smiled at it and put it back into his pocket. Finally, the frog asked, "What is the matter? I've told you I'm a beautiful princess, and that I'll stay with you for a week and do anything you want. Why won't you kiss me?" The engineer said, "Look, I'm an engineer. I don't have time for a girlfriend, but a talking frog, now that's cool."
Friday, 13 April 2007
-
So I really like "Pearls Before Swine" -- three bulletin board worthy comic strips in the past three weeks!



Thursday, 12 April 2007
-
So I just finished one task for my TFA job, and I need to move on to another, but I need a break first. I would pick up the phone and call Jenelle, but *pout* she's in Chicago. I would pick up the phone and call Gwen, but I don't have time for a long conversation, and if I call her now I'll want to hear all about the mission trip and her job search (by now, it could be her new job!), and all that. I would write the post that I've been intending to write about The Feminine Mistake or the one about the Duke lacrosse case charges being dropped, but those would require more intelligent thought than I have available at this moment. I would play with Jocelyn, but she's napping. I would watch another Gilmore Girls episode, but then I would get pulled in and I don't have time for that either. I would do some housework, but I really don't want to get up from the couch. So I'll talk to Xanga. "Hi, Xanga, how are you today? I'm bored; how about you?" (Should I worry if Xanga starts answering?)
Wednesday, 11 April 2007
-

Currently Watching
Gilmore Girls - The Complete First Season
By Gilmore Girls
see relatedSo if you like the new look of my Xanga, you'll only get to enjoy it for 21 days. That's how long the Xanga Premium trial will last, and I'm not going to pay to get it once it runs out. So enjoy for now!
Monday, 09 April 2007
-

Currently Listening
Living Proof ... Live 2
Hallelujah
see relatedSo I'm praying about whether or not I want to audition for the praise team at church. I really loved being a part of the praise team at my church in Texas, but that was a much lower-key type of thing since it's a small church. Here are my concerns.
1) Sometimes I had a problem getting caught up in "performing" and not really worshipping in Texas. I don't want that to happen, and if I can't handle being a member of praise team without that happening, then I shouldn't do it.
2) It's a significant time commitment. I would have to be at practice on the Tuesday nights before weekends in which I sang, and those run from 6:30-9 or 9:30. The church offers childcare for those, or Lee could take care of Jocelyn then. On Sundays when I sing I'll be at church all morning. (Angie once mentioned something to me about having to get there at 6:30 am.) Some Sundays I'll have to sing at the Delta Lake Center for the 9:30 service. Is this feasible with a little one? Furthermore, is it feasible or reasonable while I'm breastfeeding a little one? Should I wait until after I'm finished breastfeeding? All questions to which I don't have answers other than
right now.3) I'll miss Sunday school a lot -- both on weekends in which I sing at all three services and weekends in which I sing at the Delta Lake service. I might be able to be there for part of Sunday school, but not all. I'm already feeling a little cut off since we don't do a lot of the social stuff and since I don't do the girls' Bible study because of Refinery. (Another debate in my mind currently is whether I'll rejoin the Sunday school Bible study once Refinery ends or if I'll join the girls from my Monday night study for a summer study or if I'll take a break from group Bible studies and do something on my own.)
4) I'm a big chicken, and I'm nervous about trying out. I don't mind singing in front of people (if I did, I wouldn't be considering this at all!), but I don't like singing in front of people with the chance of rejection. I do trust that God is in control, but in my own sinful nature I'm scared and prideful (and, you see, I can mantain that pride if I don't get rejected). I didn't say this reason wasn't a little ugly!
Given those concerns, I still really want to do it. I love music, and I love leading others in worship. But I want to make sure that this is really where God wants me to be investing my time and energy and not just where I want to be. Any advice? (And when I ask for advice, I'm basically saying, "Jenelle, what do you think?" since I don't expect anyone else to read this. But, if you're reading this and you aren't Jenelle, feel free to offer your two cents as well!)
Sunday, 08 April 2007
-

Currently Listening
This Mystery
By Nichole Nordeman
Why
see relatedHe is risen!
He is risen, indeed!
HAPPY EASTER, EVERYONE!
Saturday, 07 April 2007
-
The God debate
I had grand plans of my opening post being witty and clever, but it seems that I used all of that when I told Jenelle a joke earlier today ... stay posted for more wit in the future!
This week Newsweek published a "God debate" between Sam Harris and Rick Warren. Before I launch into my thoughts concerning that discourse, first let me introduce the players. Harris is an athiest who wrote The End of Faith. Here's an excerpt that pretty much sums it up:
Imagine that we could revive a well-educated Christian of the fourteenth century. The man would prove to be a total ignoramus, except on matters of faith. His beliefs about geography, astronomy, and medicine would embarrass even a child, but he would know more or less everything there is to know about God. Though he would be considered a fool to think that the earth is flat, or that trepanning constitutes a wise medical intervention, his religious ideas would still be beyond reproach. There are two explanations for this: either we perfected our religious understanding of the world a millennium ago—while our knowledge on all other fronts was still hopelessly inchoate—or religion, being the mere maintenance of dogma, is one area of discourse that does not admit of progress. We will see that there is much to recommend the latter view.
Now the only consolation for this book is that he equally attacks all religions, not just Christianity. He basically equates any form of religion with terrorism. His book managed to be a best seller in the United States, which I consider to be a major indictment of the state of our culture. Scores of Christians responded by writing to him, and he responded in turn, this time directly attacking Christianity with his second book Letter to a Christian Nation. Warren, on the other hand, is the founding pastor at Saddleback Church and the author of several books, most notably The Purpose-Driven Life.
I was impressed with the debate published in Newsweek. I was a little apprehensive about what I'd find in the article, because I don't think it's our place as Christians to debate God. Present His truth, yes, but God is so much bigger than I am that He doesn't need my help to defend Him. But Warren did an impressive job of presenting His truth and poking holes in Harris's thinking without becoming defensive. So much so, in fact, that by the end, Harris admitted, "I don't want to pretend to be certain about anything I'm not certain about." He was talking about not wanting to pretend to be certain that God exists, but it could very easily be interpreted that he can't be certain that God doesn't exist either. By the end, he's sounding much more like an agnostic than an athiest.
Before I close with Warren's final words, I want to pause for a moment to acknowledge that it's Easter Eve. Tomorrow my husband and I will celebrate Easter, our daughter's first one. It saddens me that individuals like Harris choose to deny the One who died to take the penalty for his sins and rose from the dead to offer him the gift of eternal life. I am not worthy of that gift, but I rejoice that Christ has made me worthy through His sacrifice. Happy Easter to all of you!
You can read the complete debate here. And, now, Warren's final words...
I believe in both faith and reason. The more we learn about God, the more we understand how magnificent this universe is. There is no contradiction to it. When I look at history, I would disagree with Sam: Christianity has done far more good than bad. Altruism comes out of knowing there is more than this life, that there is a sovereign God, that I am not God. We're both betting. He's betting his life that he's right. I'm betting my life that Jesus was not a liar. When we die, if he's right, I've lost nothing. If I'm right, he's lost everything. I'm not willing to make that gamble.
Other blogs I frequent
Links of interest
Connect
About Me
-
My goals in life are to draw close to God, serve my husband, and raise my daughter to be a woman after God's heart. I'm passionate about my faith, working with youth, world events, education, and my family.



